The Hangover III Movie Reviews

That trio with box-office brio in back, in the officially finale to a ha-ha franchise. No more Hangovers after the third installment. And you don’t lament the closure, simply because the first outing of the buddies — called the Wolfpack much like Frank Sinatra and his pals were called the Rat Pack back in the 1960s — was the most outrageously funny in the series. The next was an undurable clone. And now, the third-parter is comme ci comme ca

There's no way any fan of the first 'Hangover' film can honestly claim that 'The Hangover Part III' is as much fun. There are a few good laughs to be found in the new film, but it's not nearly as outrageous as the 2009 original. In an effort perhaps to please all those who criticized the second film for being a carbon copy of the first, director Todd Phillips ditches the blackout gimmick from the previous two movies, throws out the "what-happened-last-night?" narrative device

You do not, should not, and cannot tell the same joke thrice. It no longer remains a joke. Todd Phillips must know as much. But the lust for cashing in on a box-office friendly business model is evidently irresistible. There is no other obvious reason why The Hangover Part III exists. Part I was a tipsy trip in Las Vegas. Part II was basically Part I set in Thailand. Part III, for a clear lack of imagination, returns to Vegas and tries bundling all

They say third time's a charm. But that isn't the case with Todd Philip's latest instalment of The Hangover series. Like a stand up act that falls flat if the jokes are rehashed over a period of time, the film too seems to have overstayed its fame time and got into a rut. While the first was a fluke hit and catapulted the actors and series to unimaginable fame, the second seemed like a weak attempt to cash in on the crassness and slap stick which made the first work

We have been down this road before. The buddy-comedy /action-thriller formula has worn thin yet director/co-writer Todd Phillips persists in testing the viewer’s patience with this cash-in threequel. The doltish characters are familiar as are the gross-out gags and the outcome of the makeshift plot. Even more outlandish than its smash-hit predecessors … Part III basically adheres to a more-of-the-same dumbed-down approach. The most noticeable

But unless you're accustomed to seeing the funnier side of things in a daylight robbery, this film will make you poorer both financially and emotionally. Director Todd Phillips, clearly not content with the unfunniness of 'The Hangover Part 2' returns for a third time and finally achieves what he hoped for – a giant explosion of humourlessness. The lack of humour is so powerful here that even Zach Galifianakis looks like he doesn’t give a single molecule