Wrath of the Titans Movie Reviews

Wrath of the Titans has the virtue of being the first big-budget Hollywood action extravaganza of this summer, and is completely dependent on balls-to-wall CGI. The follow up to 2010's unintentionally hilarious but immensely profitable Clash of the Titans re-teams action figure Sam Worthington and Greek beasts, and it is still quite terrible, but in an endearing sort of way. Director Jonathan Liebesman (Battle: Los Angeles) adds to Hollywood's endless supply

Warner Bros. Pictures’ Wrath Of The Titans is an action-drama based on the legend of Greek gods. Perseus (Sam Worthington), half man and half God, is the son of Zeus (Liam Neeson), the most powerful God. After fighting alongside his father in several battles, Perseus gives up the life of a warrior to look after his only son, Helius (John Bell). His dead wife had made him promise that he would take care of their son. One day, Zeus comes to Perseus

Sequel to the 2010 Clash of the Titans, not many were waiting for Wrath of the Titans with bated breath. In the sequel a decade older Perseus (Sam Worthington) is pursuing a quiet humanly life as a fisherman with his son Helius in a village, while a godly battle rages in the deep cavernous underworld of Tartarus. The three brothers, Zeus (Liam Neeson), Hades (Ralph Fiennes) and Poseidon (Danny Huston), together had overthrown their evil father Kronos

This could very well have been Mahabharata, of titanic proportions with added bonus features of 3-D and latest SFX. As utterly cheerless as its predecessor, Clash of the Titans, Jonathan Liebesman's Wrath of the Titans takes the same mythic Greek heroes by the dozen, six-limbed monsters, ravaging beasts and more such sword-wielding creatures, and installs them into a long-drawn, so-called divine battle for control and supremacy